My research focuses on discreet works and the intricate realm between private and public space. The terrain is circumvent, made up of components often considered as fragments, subplots and the everyday. I am undertaking a practical investigation into the significance of lightness and how fragments allude to something bigger than they are.
The practice pertains to something that I call 'slighter' references and I intend to test how slight they can be. In other words; what kind of narrative interpretations can be established with minimal visual/verbal clues? I am asking the question to what extent does an audience navigate or experience the incidental, and how this can be measured within an academic research framework. What does a sensibility for the discreet, subtle and fleeting look like?